Cursor AI vs GitHub Copilot - Complete Comparison 2025
An in-depth analysis of the two most popular AI code assistance tools in 2025. Discover which one best fits your workflow as a developer.
Introduction
In 2025, artificial intelligence tools for programming have revolutionized how developers write code. According to a Pragmatic Engineer survey, approximately 85% of developers use at least one AI tool in their daily workflow. In this article, we compare the two most popular options: Cursor AI and GitHub Copilot.
What is GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding assistant developed by GitHub and OpenAI. It works as an extension that integrates into your favorite code editor (VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, Vim, among others). Its philosophy is to enhance your existing environment without requiring you to switch tools.
Main Features of GitHub Copilot
- Intelligent autocomplete: Suggests code as you type based on current file context
- Copilot Chat: Conversational interface to ask questions about your code
- Coding Agent: New agent that can implement complete features autonomously
- Agent Mode: Available in VS Code, JetBrains, Eclipse, and Xcode
- Multi-model support: OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini
- AI Code Review: Automatically reviews your code using ESLint and CodeQL
What is Cursor AI
Cursor is a complete code editor based on VS Code, designed from the ground up with AI as its core element. It's not an extension but an independent development environment that natively integrates advanced AI capabilities.
Main Features of Cursor AI
- AI-first editor: AI is integrated into every aspect of the editor
- Tab Completion and Cmd+K: Autocomplete and targeted edits
- Parallel agents: Run up to 8 agents simultaneously on your code
- Visual Editor (v2.2): Visual editing for web applications
- Debug Mode: Agent automatically diagnoses bugs
- MCP Support: Model Context Protocol for external integrations
- Privacy Mode: Privacy mode with zero data retention
- More models: OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | GitHub Copilot | Cursor AI |
|---|---|---|
| Tool type | Extension/Plugin | Complete editor |
| Base | Integrable in multiple IDEs | VS Code fork |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Yes |
| AI Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Agent mode | Yes | Yes (up to 8 parallel) |
| Multi-file editing | Limited | Advanced |
| Visual editor | No | Yes (v2.2) |
| Available models | OpenAI, Claude, Gemini | OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek |
| Advanced privacy | Standard | Dedicated Privacy Mode |
| Learning curve | Low | Medium |
Pricing Comparison (December 2025)
GitHub Copilot
| Plan | Price | Premium Requests |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0/month | 50/month |
| Pro | $10/month | 300/month |
| Pro+ | $39/month | 1,500/month |
| Business | $19/user/month | Configurable |
| Enterprise | $39/user/month | Configurable |
Cursor AI
| Plan | Price | Premium Requests |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby (Free) | $0/month | 50 slow/month |
| Pro | $20/month | 500/month |
| Pro+ | $60/month | 1,500/month |
| Ultra | $200/month | 5,000/month |
| Teams | $40/user/month | 500/month |
Note: Verified students can get Copilot Pro and Cursor Pro for free.
Performance and Benchmarks
In tests conducted by developers in 2025:
- Cursor completes complex tasks 35-40% faster in context-heavy projects
- In 500 SWE-Bench tasks, Cursor averaged 62.95 seconds vs 89.91 seconds for Copilot
- Copilot offers better performance on simple autocomplete tasks
- Since September 2025, Copilot improved its throughput 2x and retrieval by 37.6%
When to Choose GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is the better choice if:
- You already use VS Code, JetBrains, or another IDE and don't want to switch
- You work extensively with GitHub for collaboration and pull requests
- You're looking for rapid adoption with minimal friction
- Your budget is limited ($10/month vs $20/month)
- You work on small to medium projects
- You're part of a large organization already using the GitHub ecosystem
When to Choose Cursor AI
Cursor is the better choice if:
- You work with large, complex codebases requiring deep context
- You need frequent multi-file editing
- You want a complete AI-first environment
- You value access to more AI models
- Code privacy is critical (Privacy Mode)
- You're a senior developer or tech lead in an agile team
- You're willing to invest more for advanced productivity
Community Opinions
Developers have divided but clear opinions:
In favor of Copilot:
- Stability and ease of integration
- Minimal learning curve
- Better value for basic use
- Ideal for daily tasks and small projects
In favor of Cursor:
- Deep codebase understanding
- Better for legacy code refactoring
- Cross-file issue debugging
- Fast onboarding to new projects
"Cursor AI is the way to go if you're new to coding and want an AI that feels like a friendly guide. But if you're more experienced and want a customizable editor with AI suggestions, VS Code with Copilot is a solid choice."
Can They Be Used Together?
Technically no. Cursor is an independent editor, while Copilot is an extension. However, some developers alternate between both depending on the project:
- Cursor for complex projects requiring deep context
- VS Code + Copilot for quick tasks and simple projects
Conclusion
Both tools are excellent but serve slightly different purposes:
-
GitHub Copilot is ideal for developers who want to improve their current workflow without friction, with an accessible price and broad editor compatibility.
-
Cursor AI is superior for complex projects requiring deep codebase understanding, multi-file editing, and granular control over AI behavior.
The final decision depends on your development style, project size, and how much you value time saved. If Cursor's advanced features save you more than 2 hours per month, the price difference justifies itself.
