Vibe Coding: Programming with Natural Language in 2025

Vibe Coding has revolutionized software development in 2025. Discover this trend coined by Andrej Karpathy, its tools, benefits, risks, and the intense debate it generates in the developer community.

Vibe Coding: Programming with Natural Language in 2025
Robert Cojocaru
demo image

What is Vibe Coding?

Vibe Coding is an AI-assisted software development technique that is transforming how we create applications. The term was coined by Andrej Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI and former AI leader at Tesla, in February 2025.

In his viral post on X (formerly Twitter), Karpathy described it as:

"There's a new kind of coding I call 'vibe coding', where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists."

The post reached over 4.5 million views, resonating with programmers worldwide who saw the possibility of building software simply by chatting with an AI.

How Does It Work?

Unlike traditional programming, where developers write every line of code manually, Vibe Coding inverts the paradigm:

  1. Describe what you want in natural language
  2. The AI generates the code accordingly
  3. Evaluate the outcome rather than reviewing each token
  4. Iterate through conversation until you achieve your goal

As Karpathy summarized it: "See stuff, say stuff, run stuff, copy-paste stuff."

Main Tools in 2025

The Vibe Coding tools ecosystem has exploded in 2025:

Claude Code

Developed by Anthropic, it leads overall adoption at 53% market share. It stands out for its deployment flexibility and security features that IT teams require. In app building benchmarks, it achieves a 93% success rate.

GitHub Copilot

Maintains approximately 42% market share among paid AI coding tools. It's used by 90% of Fortune 100 companies and has over 15 million users globally.

Cursor

The fastest-growing competitor, going from $1M to $100M in annual recurring revenue in just 2 years. It captures approximately 18% of the market and is steadily gaining ground against Copilot.

Other Tools

Replit, Windsurf, V0, and Amazon Q Developer complement the ecosystem, with over 40 million users building applications without deep coding knowledge.

Adoption Statistics

The 2025 numbers are impressive:

  • 90% of development teams use AI in their workflows (vs 61% a year ago)
  • 80% of developers use AI tools for coding according to Stack Overflow
  • 25% of Y Combinator startups (Winter 2025) have codebases 95% AI-generated
  • 25% of Google's code is AI-assisted
  • Microsoft has declared that using Copilot is "no longer optional" for its engineers

Benefits of Vibe Coding

1. Democratization of Development

Anyone with an idea can rapidly prototype applications without deep programming experience. Platforms like Replit and Cursor have made experimentation more accessible than ever.

2. Prototyping Speed

Ideal for hackathons and projects where rapid delivery is priority. Teams can ship something "good enough" in a matter of hours.

3. Increased Efficiency

Automates trivial and repetitive tasks, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problems.

4. Lower Barriers to Entry

People without technical training can materialize their software ideas.

Criticisms and Risks

Security Vulnerabilities

Applications created with Vibe Coding frequently skip essential security steps. Early in 2025, dozens of apps created with the Lovable builder went to production with hardcoded database credentials in client-side code, allowing attackers to access user data.

Code Quality Issues

One developer discovered that over a third of their codebase was duplicated. One component had swollen to nine times the recommended size, causing crashes. The same text-normalization function appeared in 15 separate files.

Skill Erosion

Over-reliance on AI can lead to:

  • Lack of understanding of underlying code
  • Reduced debugging skills
  • Diminished architecture design capacity

Team Collaboration Issues

If each developer uses their own style, prompting methods, and AI models, the codebase quickly becomes inconsistent.

The Community Debate

The Experience Paradox

Here lies the paradox: AI lowers the barrier to entry while raising the ceiling for mastery. Non-programmers and junior developers can generate impressive demos, but when things break, they often lack the conceptual skills to recover without mentorship.

Experienced developers, by contrast, can multiply their impact because they know where the boundaries are.

Study Results

A rigorous METR study published in July 2025 found that experienced developers using tools like Cursor and Claude took 19% longer to complete tasks, despite believing they were 20% faster.

Industry Position

  • 72.2% of developers don't consider Vibe Coding part of their professional work
  • 45% don't trust the accuracy of AI-generated output
  • Raymond Kok, CEO of Mendix (Siemens), states it's "deeply unreliable for enterprise use"

Andrew Ng vs Karpathy

Andrew Ng has criticized the term, arguing that it misleads people into assuming that software engineers just "go with the vibes" when using AI tools.

The Emerging Consensus

The message from industry leaders is critical but constructive: use AI to assist, not to abdicate. Code still needs human judgment, especially if it's destined for production.

As one veteran put it: "AI tools are copilots, not autopilots."

When to Use Vibe Coding

  • Rapid prototypes and MVPs
  • Low-risk personal projects
  • Hackathons and experiments
  • Automation of trivial tasks
  • Learning and exploration

When to Avoid It

  • Critical production systems
  • Applications with strict security requirements
  • Long-term enterprise projects
  • When maintainability is priority

Cultural Recognition

The impact of Vibe Coding has been such that:

  • Merriam-Webster listed it as a "slang & trending" term in March 2025
  • Collins Dictionary named it Word of the Year 2025

Conclusion

Vibe Coding represents a paradigmatic shift in how we conceive software development. It's a powerful tool that democratizes application creation, but it comes with important responsibilities and limitations.

The key is understanding that it's just another tool in the developer's arsenal, not a replacement for fundamental technical knowledge. The best results will come from combining AI speed with human experience and judgment.

As the community consensus states: Vibe Coding is excellent for prototyping and automating trivial tasks, but it doesn't replace disciplined development on complex systems.

The future of software development probably isn't human vs AI, but human with AI, each contributing their unique strengths.

Other posts